<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Anders Ramsay.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andersramsay.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andersramsay.com</link>
	<description>user experience design, living in new york city, and more...</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Thoughts About the Balsamiq Mockup Tool by Anders</title>
		<link>http://www.andersramsay.com/2008/11/06/some-thoughts-about-balsamiq/#comment-7565</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andersramsay.com/?p=216#comment-7565</guid>
		<description>Hi Peldi - glad to see you found my feedback useful!  

Re. use on the web, I think the issue might be that it simply is not clear how to publish to the web or edit online.  Perhaps this had to do with the version of B'iq I was using?

Re. actual drawing/sketching:  I think I just want to have a pen and eraser tool to be able to sketch quick custom elements, such as just adding a circle or an X or a line here or there.  Drawing something in Illustrator or whatever, I think would be too time-consuming.

Re.  sharing/embedding , I think it would be good to generate a JS/Html snippet that one could plop into any web page.

And yes, Quick Add definitely needs to be made more prominent.

But as I said before, I think you've done great work with this tool - keep it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peldi - glad to see you found my feedback useful!  </p>
<p>Re. use on the web, I think the issue might be that it simply is not clear how to publish to the web or edit online.  Perhaps this had to do with the version of B&#8217;iq I was using?</p>
<p>Re. actual drawing/sketching:  I think I just want to have a pen and eraser tool to be able to sketch quick custom elements, such as just adding a circle or an X or a line here or there.  Drawing something in Illustrator or whatever, I think would be too time-consuming.</p>
<p>Re.  sharing/embedding , I think it would be good to generate a JS/Html snippet that one could plop into any web page.</p>
<p>And yes, Quick Add definitely needs to be made more prominent.</p>
<p>But as I said before, I think you&#8217;ve done great work with this tool - keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter&#8217;s Reply Weirdness by Peter Van Dijck&#8217;s Guide to Ease &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.andersramsay.com/2008/11/11/twitters-reply-weirdness/#comment-7358</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Van Dijck&#8217;s Guide to Ease &#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andersramsay.com/?p=237#comment-7358</guid>
		<description>[...] Anders explains how Twitter gets a UI bit wrong (the &#8220;reply&#8221; feature), I agree with him. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Anders explains how Twitter gets a UI bit wrong (the &#8220;reply&#8221; feature), I agree with him. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter&#8217;s Reply Weirdness by Anders</title>
		<link>http://www.andersramsay.com/2008/11/11/twitters-reply-weirdness/#comment-7174</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andersramsay.com/?p=237#comment-7174</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/brownorama" rel="nofollow"&gt;@brownorama&lt;/a&gt; made a similar point (er,  tweet), and it's obviously great that there at least is somewhere where you can see replies.  But at the same time, it would be great if there was some visual cue that you in fact have received new replies.  The way it is now, it's up to the user to be vigilant and take action to learn if there are new replies.  Since adding a simple, unobtrusive visual cue (such as a tiny "New Replies" message next to the replies link) would be pretty simple, I think this is definitely still a flaw in the Twitter UI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://twitter.com/brownorama" rel="nofollow">@brownorama</a> made a similar point (er,  tweet), and it&#8217;s obviously great that there at least is somewhere where you can see replies.  But at the same time, it would be great if there was some visual cue that you in fact have received new replies.  The way it is now, it&#8217;s up to the user to be vigilant and take action to learn if there are new replies.  Since adding a simple, unobtrusive visual cue (such as a tiny &#8220;New Replies&#8221; message next to the replies link) would be pretty simple, I think this is definitely still a flaw in the Twitter UI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter&#8217;s Reply Weirdness by Robert O'Rourke</title>
		<link>http://www.andersramsay.com/2008/11/11/twitters-reply-weirdness/#comment-7169</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert O'Rourke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andersramsay.com/?p=237#comment-7169</guid>
		<description>You can see all the replies in the @replies section regardless of whether you follow them or not. Useful if you're a big name and want to ask a general question. Mollydotcom is always doing twitterpolls for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can see all the replies in the @replies section regardless of whether you follow them or not. Useful if you&#8217;re a big name and want to ask a general question. Mollydotcom is always doing twitterpolls for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Thoughts About the Balsamiq Mockup Tool by Peldi Guilizzoni</title>
		<link>http://www.andersramsay.com/2008/11/06/some-thoughts-about-balsamiq/#comment-7167</link>
		<dc:creator>Peldi Guilizzoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andersramsay.com/?p=216#comment-7167</guid>
		<description>Anders, thanks SO MUCH for the review, it's just what I need in order to make the product better. Lots there so let me try to go through it:

Re Gliffy: the Gliffy guys were my inspiration as a small "web office plugins" company, and I certainly think our offerings are complementary. They are a much broader tool which can be used for many types of diagrams, Mockups is extremely focused on GUI sketching.

Access / Setup - you CAN use this on the web. Both in "demo mode" on my site (which is fully functional but with a nag every 5 minutes), and as a plugin for Confluence, JIRA or XWiki. The Desktop version is designed for when you are offline, or if you like to save your data on your hard-drive, old skool! :) Plus the Desktop version supports more keyboard shortcuts than the web versions and is a bit snappier, so you might want to edit offline then export/import into the web version for collaboration. A purely SaaS version of Mockups (subscription based) is not available at this point in time, I'm still on the fence on whether to offer it or not.

User Interface - I know, I need some skinning love for the affordances...I'm not a great visual designer...that said, I am pretty happy with the structure of the app. I agree that the library might fit better to the right, and that the tabs might look better at the top. Let me try it out.

Re: my UI blurring in the mockup's UI, is it because of my use of dark gray? I cleaned things up a bit since your review, with a more consistent use of blue for highlights in the chrome (green is now reserved for the mockup).

Actual Drawing / Sketching - can you tell me a bit more about what you'd want to sketch? Are the Arrows, Curly Braces, Scratch-Out and other controls in the Markup category not enough? For custom widgets, why not draw it in Illustrator/Photoshop/paper and pencil and bring it in as an image? Those tools are certainly better than what I could build for free-form drawing.

Sharing/Embedding: yup, look at the videos of Mockups for Confluence, JIRA and XWiki on my site for examples of people collaborating on GUI designs with Mockups.

Widget Library: so sorry you didn't catch the power of "Quick Add". It obviously needs to be highlighted / explained better - it's not a standard search, it's more like Spotlight or Quicksilver. It's really powerful, for instance I work with the UI Library hidden at all times (View Menu), and only use Quick Add. I have a few ideas on how to improve the design to make this more clear, stay tuned. Thanks for forcing me to take another look at it!

Paper Prototyping - yes! And now with 1.5 you'll have a built-in "Print" support, streamlined! :)

Community Library - I'm working on it with the help of a few customers, stay tuned.

Sketch Pad: you can hide it today (View Menu)!

Thanks again for the feedback!
Peldi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anders, thanks SO MUCH for the review, it&#8217;s just what I need in order to make the product better. Lots there so let me try to go through it:</p>
<p>Re Gliffy: the Gliffy guys were my inspiration as a small &#8220;web office plugins&#8221; company, and I certainly think our offerings are complementary. They are a much broader tool which can be used for many types of diagrams, Mockups is extremely focused on GUI sketching.</p>
<p>Access / Setup - you CAN use this on the web. Both in &#8220;demo mode&#8221; on my site (which is fully functional but with a nag every 5 minutes), and as a plugin for Confluence, JIRA or XWiki. The Desktop version is designed for when you are offline, or if you like to save your data on your hard-drive, old skool! :) Plus the Desktop version supports more keyboard shortcuts than the web versions and is a bit snappier, so you might want to edit offline then export/import into the web version for collaboration. A purely SaaS version of Mockups (subscription based) is not available at this point in time, I&#8217;m still on the fence on whether to offer it or not.</p>
<p>User Interface - I know, I need some skinning love for the affordances&#8230;I&#8217;m not a great visual designer&#8230;that said, I am pretty happy with the structure of the app. I agree that the library might fit better to the right, and that the tabs might look better at the top. Let me try it out.</p>
<p>Re: my UI blurring in the mockup&#8217;s UI, is it because of my use of dark gray? I cleaned things up a bit since your review, with a more consistent use of blue for highlights in the chrome (green is now reserved for the mockup).</p>
<p>Actual Drawing / Sketching - can you tell me a bit more about what you&#8217;d want to sketch? Are the Arrows, Curly Braces, Scratch-Out and other controls in the Markup category not enough? For custom widgets, why not draw it in Illustrator/Photoshop/paper and pencil and bring it in as an image? Those tools are certainly better than what I could build for free-form drawing.</p>
<p>Sharing/Embedding: yup, look at the videos of Mockups for Confluence, JIRA and XWiki on my site for examples of people collaborating on GUI designs with Mockups.</p>
<p>Widget Library: so sorry you didn&#8217;t catch the power of &#8220;Quick Add&#8221;. It obviously needs to be highlighted / explained better - it&#8217;s not a standard search, it&#8217;s more like Spotlight or Quicksilver. It&#8217;s really powerful, for instance I work with the UI Library hidden at all times (View Menu), and only use Quick Add. I have a few ideas on how to improve the design to make this more clear, stay tuned. Thanks for forcing me to take another look at it!</p>
<p>Paper Prototyping - yes! And now with 1.5 you&#8217;ll have a built-in &#8220;Print&#8221; support, streamlined! :)</p>
<p>Community Library - I&#8217;m working on it with the help of a few customers, stay tuned.</p>
<p>Sketch Pad: you can hide it today (View Menu)!</p>
<p>Thanks again for the feedback!<br />
Peldi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter&#8217;s Reply Weirdness by Anders</title>
		<link>http://www.andersramsay.com/2008/11/11/twitters-reply-weirdness/#comment-7147</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andersramsay.com/?p=237#comment-7147</guid>
		<description>Wolf - great point!  I knew there was a reason for why it's set up the way they currently have it.  But at the same time, I think the issue I am raising is really from the vantage point of that annoying twitterer, to display a little message to inform them that their (annoying) tweet won't be seen by the person they are replying to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wolf - great point!  I knew there was a reason for why it&#8217;s set up the way they currently have it.  But at the same time, I think the issue I am raising is really from the vantage point of that annoying twitterer, to display a little message to inform them that their (annoying) tweet won&#8217;t be seen by the person they are replying to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter&#8217;s Reply Weirdness by Wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.andersramsay.com/2008/11/11/twitters-reply-weirdness/#comment-7146</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andersramsay.com/?p=237#comment-7146</guid>
		<description>I believe the following/followers system is designed to only see what you actually want to see, and to allow you to filter out any kind of noise you don't want to see. Let's say there's this one annoying person that always replies @you, you don't want to block him, but you also don't follow him [because he's annoying]. In the current Twitter, you're never even going to notice.

Then again, this also filters out the 'good' @replies. I use an RSS feed from Summize/Twitter search to track all mentions of my twitter username, several other usernames, and the names of companies and organizations I am associated with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the following/followers system is designed to only see what you actually want to see, and to allow you to filter out any kind of noise you don&#8217;t want to see. Let&#8217;s say there&#8217;s this one annoying person that always replies @you, you don&#8217;t want to block him, but you also don&#8217;t follow him [because he's annoying]. In the current Twitter, you&#8217;re never even going to notice.</p>
<p>Then again, this also filters out the &#8216;good&#8217; @replies. I use an RSS feed from Summize/Twitter search to track all mentions of my twitter username, several other usernames, and the names of companies and organizations I am associated with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Thoughts About the Balsamiq Mockup Tool by Peter Van Dijck&#8217;s Guide to Ease &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.andersramsay.com/2008/11/06/some-thoughts-about-balsamiq/#comment-7045</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Van Dijck&#8217;s Guide to Ease &#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 12:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andersramsay.com/?p=216#comment-7045</guid>
		<description>[...] Anders writes a good review of the Balsamiq mockup tool. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Anders writes a good review of the Balsamiq mockup tool. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Three Reasons Why I Don&#8217;t Use Prototyping Tools by Some Thoughts About the Balsamiq Mockup Tool &#8212; Anders Ramsay.com</title>
		<link>http://www.andersramsay.com/2008/10/29/three-reasons-why-i-dont-use-prototyping-tools/#comment-7026</link>
		<dc:creator>Some Thoughts About the Balsamiq Mockup Tool &#8212; Anders Ramsay.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 21:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andersramsay.com/?p=194#comment-7026</guid>
		<description>[...] is, of course, a slight irony in that only a few days ago, I was writing about why I don&#8217;t use prototyping tools, and here I am writing a review of a prototyping tool. Well, not quite. I think Balsamiq is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is, of course, a slight irony in that only a few days ago, I was writing about why I don&#8217;t use prototyping tools, and here I am writing a review of a prototyping tool. Well, not quite. I think Balsamiq is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Three Reasons Why I Don&#8217;t Use Prototyping Tools by Mike Padgett</title>
		<link>http://www.andersramsay.com/2008/10/29/three-reasons-why-i-dont-use-prototyping-tools/#comment-7021</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Padgett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andersramsay.com/?p=194#comment-7021</guid>
		<description>Interesting post and I'm inclined to agree strongly with what you're saying about the tools playing catch-up. It can be hard to describe asynchronous interactions, for example.

I've reached a point on a few occasions in the recent past at which I've thought &lt;em&gt;"I may as well just build this"&lt;/em&gt; so complex does the prototype start to become. It can be a hard balance to strike.

I wouldn't necessarily agree that they're just for non-technical users, but you do sometimes wonder whether they're helping or hindering, particularly during the more hectic iterative processes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post and I&#8217;m inclined to agree strongly with what you&#8217;re saying about the tools playing catch-up. It can be hard to describe asynchronous interactions, for example.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve reached a point on a few occasions in the recent past at which I&#8217;ve thought <em>&#8220;I may as well just build this&#8221;</em> so complex does the prototype start to become. It can be a hard balance to strike.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t necessarily agree that they&#8217;re just for non-technical users, but you do sometimes wonder whether they&#8217;re helping or hindering, particularly during the more hectic iterative processes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
